Santi Forest Monastery is a Buddhist Nuns’ hermitage, a place
of training and practice for nuns in the Forest tradition of Buddhism. It is set in the rugged bush ravines of the Southern Highlands of New South Wales, Australia.
Lay people may visit or stay for periods of time to study and practice the Buddhist teachings with the community. Monks may also visit and stay for a short period of time, at the discretion of the resident nuns’ community.
Santi monastery was first established in 2003 by Bhante Sujato, with a special emphasis on the earliest teachings of the Buddha that are shared by all Buddhist traditions. Santi is known for its advocacy and support of full ordination for Buddhist nuns (Bhikkhunis). When Bhante left in 2012, he handed Santi over to the nuns’ community, to develop as a Bhikkhuni monastery, a decision supported by Santi’s spiritual director, Ajahn Brahm. Since 2014, Ayya Nirodha has been the senior Bhikkhuni in residence at Santi .
The property at 100 Coalmines Road was purchased in 1986 by Elisabeth Gorski. She was a local Buddhist practitioner, who was working with local meditation teacher John Hale to set up a meditation centre. As a fitting precursor to Santi’s role in supporting women’s ordination, one of the founding trustees was the first Western bhikkhuni of modern times, Ayyā Khemā.
The meditation centre never eventuated, and John Hale resettled in Tasmania, where he passed away a few years later. Elisabeth kept the property, and from time to time retreats were held or a monastic would reside, and yet the place never fulfilled its potential. Meanwhile, another local monastery, Suññataram, was set up on land offered by Elisabeth, although entirely independent of the Coalmines Road property.
In 1997, Elisabeth purchased two lots adjacent to the original property, bringing the monastery size to around 150 acres. Shortly afterwards, she went to Perth, where she took ordination under Ajahn Brahm and Ajahn Vāyāmā at Dhammasāra Nuns’ Monastery. On October 22nd 2009, she became one of the first group of women to receive full Bhikkhuni ordination in the Forest Tradition in Australia.
Before leaving, Elisabeth established a charitable body, then called Citta Bhavana Incorporated, to manage the Coalmines Road property. This consisted of a small committee, with Ajahn Brahm as the Spiritual Director. At the AGM of 2003, it was agreed that the property should be run as a Forest Monastery under the leadership of Bhante Sujato, and the name was officially changed to Santi Forest Monastery Incorporated. In subsequent years, the constitution was amended to reflect these changes, and Bhante Sujato replaced Ajahn Brahm as the Spiritual Director.
In 2012, Bhante Sujato decided to hand the monastery over to the nuns’ community, so they may develop Santi as a Bhikkhuni monastery. Since then, various nuns have stayed and practiced at Santi for different periods of time. Currently, Ayya Nirodha is the senior Bhikkhuni in residence.
Santi is created in the spirit of the Buddhist Forest Tradition. For us, the forest (or ‘bush’ as we say in Australia) is the temple. We remember that the Buddha went forth to the forest, practiced in the caves and wilderness, and was Awakened beneath the Bodhi Tree.
In the early years of Buddhism, all monastics lived in the forest. Gradually, there was a drift towards more settled monasteries in the villages and cities, but the forest life has always been there. Throughout history, whenever Buddhism monasticism becomes too domesticated and safe, there always arises a ‘back-to-the-roots’ revival of the forest contemplative life. In modern Thailand, Sri Lanka, Burma, Vietnam, Malaysia, Taiwan, and elsewhere one can find monasteries and hermitages tucked away in secluded regions, providing quiet havens for contemplation and solitude.
The most vital modern resurgence of the forest tradition was in Thailand. The modern forest tradition was made possible by the reforms initiated in the mid 19th Century by the future King Mongkut (1804-1868). During his 27 years as a monk, he became highly critical of Buddhism as it was then practiced in Thailand. He believed that it was full of magic and superstitions that had nothing to do with Buddhism, and was particularly critical of those who mindlessly passed down the teachings according to what their teachers said, without any understanding of the Buddha’s own words. He undertook an intensive study of the Pali Canon, which he believed to contain the earliest teachings of the Buddha. Using modern text-critical methods, he attempted to divest Buddhism of its harmful and irrational accretions, and to return to a pristine form of original Buddhism. These inquiries became the foundation for the reformist Dhammayut order.
In its endeavour to construct a Buddhism on modern, rational lines, Mongkut’s reforms tended to deprecate meditation. Indeed, it was commonly believed, and still is today, that meditation was useless, as the lofty spiritual attainments spoken of in the ancient texts were believed to be no longer accessible in our degenerate age.
The renowned meditation master Ajahn Mun (1870-1949) was not content with this ideology, and he resolved to test it for himself. He developed a practice emphasizing austerity, strict discipline, and orthodox meditation, dispensing with the magical and superstitious elements that then dominated Thai mysticism. Rejecting the purely scholastic emphasis of the reformist Dhammayut order in the early 20th Century, Ajahn Mun insisted that the path to realization of the Dhamma was as open and relevant today as it was in the Buddha’s. While the basic doctrinal framework that he used was informed by the rationalist conclusions of Mongkut, Ajahn Mun strongly emphasized the primacy of direct experience over mere book learning. His radical, uncompromising approach led to years of conflict with the central authorities, who preferred their monks tame and civilized. In the intensity of his gaze as preserved in the few photographs of his that exist it is easy to understand how he is regarded by many in Thailand as an arahant, or fully Awakened master.
Ajahn Mun had many talented disciples who established their own monasteries. One of the best known was Ajahn Chah (1918-1992). He spent his formative years wandering around Thailand, staying in forests and monasteries, learning from many different teachers, but always dedicated to meditation. Eventually he settled down near his home town and set up the monastery Wat Nong Pa Pong. While Ajahn Mun emphasized solitary, dedicated striving, Ajahn Chah saw how such practice tended to become dependent on the strength of charismatic teachers, and when those teachers passed away, the practice fell apart. He changed the approach found in the Ajahn Mun circles to give more emphasis to the Sangha over the teacher.
Ajahn Chah became extremely popular as a teacher, and the organization he founded is now by far the largest group of forest monasteries in Thailand. He attracted many Western disciples, who set up the first forest monastery in Thailand for English speaking monks, Wat Pa Nanachat, in 1975. Subsequently, several Wat Pa Pong branch monasteries were established internationally.
The forest tradition of 20th Century Thailand has been one of the most fascinating and important forces in the development of modern Buddhism, both in the East and West.
Santi Forest Monastery is established with three primary goals.
- Building a community based on Vinaya
- Study of the Buddha’s words in the early scriptures
- Meditation in seclusion
3.1: Building a community based on Vinaya
The Vinaya is the code of monastic conduct for Buddhist monks and nuns. It originates in the rules and procedures that were laid down by the Buddha. These were codified, extended, and organized in the generations following the Buddha’s passing away to create the Vinaya texts as we have them today. The primary texts used at Santi are those of the Pali Vinaya as passed down in the Theravada school, which are similar in most respects to the Vinayas preserved in Chinese and Tibetan translations.
Vinaya contains the famous pāṭimokkha list of rules, 227 for bhikkhus, 311 for bhikkhunis in the Pali version. These rules structure important aspects of monastic life, such as celibacy, wearing robes, not using money, use of food, and so on. Such rules are strictly emphasized in the Forest Tradition, and monastics at Santi are expected to follow these rules. However, we do not follow some of the more culturally specific customs, such as the use of a cloth by monks on which to receive offerings made by a woman, as is practiced in Thailand.
The disciplinary aspect of Vinaya, however, is only one aspect. The Vinaya also sets out organizational principles to guide how a Sangha community should be run. According to the Vinaya, a community should be entirely egalitarian, without hierarchy or command, but with respect for elders and teachers. All important decisions are made by the community as a whole, and where possible, in consensus.
The community should appoint Sangha officials to take care of various tasks, such as monastery maintenance, storekeeping, accommodation, and so on. Within each department, the respective Sangha official has authority, but there is no overruling authority for the Sangha as a whole, except for the Vinaya itself.
The Vinaya does not mention an ‘abbot’, and there is no allowance for a power of command by seniors over juniors. The relationship to authority is based on respect, not obedience.
Traditional monastic forms have drifted away from this model, to such an extent that monastics often believe that hierarchy and obedience are essential aspects of Vinaya. This is the result of the historical development of the Sangha as a social institution that reflects the governance of the society in which it lives. However, the way the Buddha originally set up the Sangha is uniquely suited to our egalitarian, democratic culture, with governance based on principle, rather than personality.
3.2: Study of the Buddha’s words in the early scriptures
At Santi we believe that it is essential for new monastics and serious practitioners to have a thorough grounding in the essential teachings of the Buddha as laid down in scripture.
All students at Santi are expected to acquire a good knowledge of the Buddhist Suttas and Vinaya. In addition, we encourage those who are interested in Pali, Buddhist history and so on to pursue these further.
The study of scriptures is not based on secondary sources or modern compilations, but starts directly with the original text in its original languages. When Bhante Sujato was resident, he was able to read and use the Pali Nikāyas and Vinaya as primary sources for study, and also referred to corresponding Āgama and Vinaya texts in Chinese, Sanskrit, and Tibetan when possible. His aim was to learn from the original teachings, before Buddhism split into competing schools. Without any Pali scholars in residence however, residents at Santi rely on the various English translations of the early Buddhist texts, of which there are several good translations to choose from.
3.3: Meditation in seclusion
Like traditional forest monasteries, Santi is set in a large bush environment, perfect for meditation. Residents live in small rustic huts scattered around the property, and gather in the main house only for teachings, meals, work, and so on. The monastery is planned and managed with emphasis on devotion to meditation in seclusion.
The practice of the Four Brahma Viharas (Divine Abidings): loving-kindness, compassion, sympathetic joy and equanimity are also essential cultivations for students of Buddhism, whether in private or together with others. Such attitudes and practices aid mutual respect, harmony and concord in community, and support the deepening of our meditation in solitude.
The Buddha constantly exhorted his students: ‘Here are roots of trees, here are empty huts – practice meditation! Do not be negligent! Do not regret it later!’ In his time, meditation was primarily a solitary matter, not performed in meditation halls in large groups. This practice is continued in many of the Thai forest monasteries today, whereas other centres have developed a strong group practice. At Santi, we try to follow the earlier model, which gives each individual the freedom to set their own pace in meditation. For those who wish, however, there are some optional group meditations in the hall or cave.
When leaving the urban life for the forest, there is more to it than simply quiet and seclusion. The forest is the place of the wilds, where the conditioning and expectations of culture fall away. Sitting alone, in the thick blackness of the night, with no-one around and only the beasts of the forest for company, can be a challenging and exhilarating experience. At such times, the details of method or doctrine seem of little importance, and the essential thing is the sincerity with which one is able to face the truth.
The property is wholly owned by Santi Forest Monastery Incorporated, a not-for-profit charity. The management is carried out by a committee that is elected each year.
The 2018 committee:
Chairperson – Jitindriya (Loraine Keats)
Vice Chair – Jen Smith
Secretary – Margaret Smith
Treasurer – Dhash Dhash
Public Officer – Harshani Udagami
Committee Members – Jayantha Sellahewa; Ranjan de Silva; Anandi de Silva; Norbert Elberich.
The committee meets quarterly, and is charged with ensuring the financial compliance and security of the monastery. They ensure all accounts are kept to the stringent requirements of the Australian charities laws, and are professionally audited each year. In addition, the committee assists with various administrative duties in running the monastery, such as insurance, work safety, and so on.
If you have any inquiries in how the monastery is managed, or monastery finances, don’t hesitate to contact our office.
Key Committee documents
- Santi FM Constitution (PDF)
Please note that Santi Forest Monastery is owned and managed independently, and has no institutional affiliations.
Santi is a monastery that supports the full ordination of women in Buddhism. Even though the Buddha established an order of fully ordained nuns, called ‘bhikkhunis’, this order had disappeared from traditional Theravada and Tibetan Buddhist lineages.
More recently however, the Bhikkhuni order has been revived, thanks to the introduction of an ordination lineage from the East Asian tradition, which has always preserved the Bhikkhuni lineage. In Taiwan, Korea, and Vietnam, the Bhikkhunis outnumber the Bhikkhus, and provide the mainstay of much Buddhist training and education.
Women practicing in the Tibetan tradition started taking Bhikkhuni ordination in the 1970s, and now many of them have become renowned teachers, such as Tenzin Palmo, Thubten Chodren, and Lekshe Tsomo. Since the reintroduction of Bhikkhuni ordination in Sri Lanka in the late 1990s, there are now several hundred Theravadin Bhikkhunis there, as well as a few in Thailand, the U.S., and elsewhere.
In addition to Santi FM, there are two other Theravadin Bhikkhuni monasteries in Australia, Dhammasāra in Perth and Newbury Forest Monastery in Melbourne.
Santi Forest Monastery is one of the few English-speaking monasteries in the world where women can practice and train as a Bhikkhuni. At Santi Nuns’ Monastery, male and female guests stay with separate facilities and dwelling areas, but come together for meals, teachings, and work.
The Bhikkhuni revival has met with opposition from conservative forces within the Theravadin Sangha. In focussing on the ‘purity’ of lineage and the supposed legal problems with Bhikkhuni ordination, such opposition shows a lack of compassion for women and little understanding of the harmful effects of discrimination.
It is time to move on. The eightfold path, the four noble truths, dependent origination, the way of wisdom and compassion: these are the true teachings of the Buddha. None of them have anything to do with gender.
This point was explicitly made, perhaps for the first time in human history, by a Bhikkhuni in the Buddha’s time. In a remarkable dialogue preserved in the canonical Saṁyutta Nikāya, the fully Awakened Bhikkhuni Somā was challenged by Māra, the Buddhist Satan or Trickster. Playing the archetypal male chauvinist, he challenged:
That dhamma that’s so hard to achieve
Which is to be attained by the seers
Can’t be attained by a woman
With her two-fingered wisdom!
But Somā recognized him, and replied undaunted:
What does ‘womanhood’ matter at all,
When the mind is concentrated well
When knowledge flows on steadily
As one sees correctly into Dhamma?
One to whom it might occur,
‘I’m a woman’, or ‘I’m a man’,
Or ‘I’m anything at all’ –
Is fit for Māra to address!