Tag Archives: Pali

White Bones Red Rot Black Snakes

Enchant­ing, power­ful, hor­rific, beau­ti­ful, wise, deadly, com­pas­sion­ate, seduct­ive. Women in Buddhist story and image are all these things and more. She takes the signs of the ancient god­dess – the lotus, the sac­red grove, the ser­pent, the sac­ri­fice – and uses them in aston­ish­ing new ways. Her story is one of suf­fer­ing and great tri­als, and through it all an unquench­able long­ing to be free. This beau­ti­fully illus­trated work is as layered and sub­vers­ive as myth­o­logy itself. Based dir­ectly on authen­tic Buddhist texts, and informed with insights from psy­cho­logy and com­par­at­ive myth­o­logy, it takes a fresh look at how Buddhist women have been depic­ted by men and how they have depic­ted themselves.

A Swift Pair of Messengers

Serenity and insight are the two great wings of Buddhist med­it­a­tion. They each have a spe­cial role to play in the path to Awaken­ing. While some mod­ern approaches seek to mar­gin­al­ize serenity in favor of ‘dry’ insight, the Buddha’s own dis­courses place serenity right at the cen­ter of the path. This book col­lects vir­tu­ally all the sig­ni­fic­ant pas­sages on this topic that are found in the early dis­courses, care­fully elu­cid­ated for the mod­ern reader.

Bhikkhuni Vinaya Studies

Although his­tor­ic­ally mar­gin­al­ized, Buddhist nuns are tak­ing their place in mod­ern Buddhism. Like the monks, Buddhist nuns live by an ancient sys­tem of mon­astic law, the Vinaya. This work invest­ig­ates vari­ous areas of uncer­tainty and con­tro­versy in how the Vinaya is to be under­stood and applied today.

The Ironic Assumptions of Gregory Schopen

Gen­er­a­tions of schol­ars, from the incep­tion of the mod­ern study of Buddhism, have estab­lished a long-lasting and rel­at­ively stable con­sensus regard­ing the texts and his­tory of early Buddhism. While inev­it­ably sub­ject to the usual kinds of uncer­tainty, incom­plete­ness, and evol­u­tion, this con­sensus has provided a frame­work for the pos­it­ive devel­op­ment of our under­stand­ing of the Buddha, his teach­ings, and his com­munity. This con­sensus has been chal­lenged by the prom­in­ent Amer­cian aca­demic, Gregory Schopen. His essays have been the most influ­en­tial reas­sess­ment in the his­tory of Buddhist stud­ies. Many of his ideas are regarded as vir­tu­ally canon­ical in mod­ern aca­demia, and have per­meated far bey­ond the nor­mal reach of Buddhist aca­demic work. How­ever, his argu­ments are far bet­ter regarded among non-specialists than among those who actu­ally study early Buddhism. This essay shows a num­ber of flaws and prob­lems with Schopen’s work on early Buddhism, by implic­a­tion sup­port­ing the tra­di­tional consensus.

Why Devadatta Was No Saint

Devad­atta is depic­ted as the archetypal vil­lain in all Buddhist tra­di­tions. Regin­ald Ray has argued for a rad­ical reas­sess­ment of Devad­atta as a forest saint who was unfairly maligned in later mon­astic Buddhism. His work has been influ­en­tial, but it relies on omis­sions and mis­taken read­ings of the sources. Ray’s claim that ‘there is no over­lap between the Mahāsaṅghika treat­ment [of Devad­atta] and that of the five [Sthavira] schools’ is untrue. On the con­trary, the man­ner in which Devad­atta is depic­ted in the Mahāsaṅghika is broadly sim­ilar to the Sthavira accounts. Such dif­fer­ences as do exist are lit­er­ary rather than doc­trinal. The stor­ies of Devadatta’s deprav­ity became increas­ingly lurid in later Buddhism, but this is a nor­mal fea­ture of the myth­o­lo­giz­ing pro­cess, and has noth­ing to do with any ant­ag­on­ism against forest ascet­ics. In any case, the early sources are unan­im­ous in con­demning Devad­atta as the instig­ator of the first schism in the Buddhist community.

Just A Little Peace

The Buddha’s words exem­plify peace, teach us peace, and lead to the ulti­mate peace of Nib­bana. It is a sad thing that in the com­plex­it­ies and con­tra­dic­tions of Buddhist his­tory, peace has some­times been sac­ri­ficed on the altar of Buddhist nation­al­ism. By ask­ing the hard ques­tions and accept­ing the answers fear­lessly we can arrive at the essen­tial, the true state of peace, for the sake of which all Buddhist eth­ics, med­it­a­tion, and wis­dom are taught.

All Dhammas

The basis of insight med­it­a­tion is the con­tem­pla­tion of imper­man­ence, suf­fer­ing, and not-self. Yet even here we are faced with a tricky inter­pret­ive prob­lem: for while all saṅkhāras are said to be imper­man­ent and suf­fer­ing, all dham­mas are said to be not-self. Why this subtle, enig­matic shift, and what are the implic­a­tions for meditation?

Satipaṭṭhāna and the Evolution of the Dhamma Theory

While the Satipaṭṭhana Sutta is often claimed to be the most import­ant of the Buddha’s teach­ings, close tex­tual ana­lysis reveals that it is a com­pos­ite text, with sub­stan­tial dif­fer­ences between the many exist­ing ver­sions. The use of the fun­da­mental term dhamma in fact reveals the text to be part of the early Abhid­hamma movement.

Without Delay

The term akā­lika, ‘time­less’, is one of the most famil­iar in the whole Dhamma. It is recited as part of the daily chant­ing as a fun­da­mental aspect of the Dhamma. And yet its mean­ing is far from clear, and so it has attrac­ted many inter­pret­a­tions. Rather than being a philo­soph­ical notion, it seems that is a call to action: if you prac­tice, you can see the res­ults for yourself.

It’s Time

It’s time. We need a new paradigm. For 2500 years Buddhism has been con­stantly chan­ging, adapt­ing, evolving; yet the myths of the schools insist that the Dhamma remains the same.